I blame my father for my poor time-keeping. Embarrassing childhood moments include memories of dad arriving to collect us from places where we were waiting for him outside closed doors, our party balloon already deflated, lunch break was over, or the host was anxious to get on ...
But now I live in a country where being late is a standard part of cultural practice, so my learning fits in. And no-one worries that I am always late for meetings or events.
Or do they?
In fact, I notice that many of my friends are sticklers for time. My Portuguese ex-husband was always five minutes early - for everything. Like his father. And they were livid with people who were late.
I am also reminded of cultural differences as I got mad with my son yesterday. He can sit and do nothing as people - women - do the domestic chores around him. He points out that none of his (male) friends do anything at home beyond the basics of personal hygiene as their mother/grandmother/aunt cook, wash up, clean, iron, make the bed for them. I say nothing, but get flashes of the 40+ year olds I know who are still in the same situation.
On the other hand I also remember that I have an increasing number of Portuguese male friends who play a principle role in domestic matters as a matter of course. And a number of Portuguese women - mothers - who don't have a clue how to cook or to clean.
These thoughts come to the surface as I prepare a chapter proposal for a book called "Learning cultures in contact". There is something in the description of the context of the book which makes me both interested and uneasy. This is what it says:
"Whilst much attention has been paid to the solving of the technological problems and practical pedagogical challenges posed by this global project, issues of culture and identity in the online classroom remain under-theorised. In part, this is due to a prevailing model of the online social world as a 'global village', in which it is imagined that differences between people and groups get smoothed out over time. But it is also due to the influence of viewpoints, such as Geert Hofstede's, which associate culture primarily with national identity. From these perspectives the socialisation experiences of individual learners, or the enculturation processes of specific groups or institutions, are often hidden beneath the larger stories of virtuality or ethnicity."
There is something that makes me squirm about grand narratives, of "the larger stories of virtuality or ethnicity" that attribute culture and identity to "the socialisation experiences of individual learners". I know I do it myself sometimes, but that doesn't stop me squirming.
And it reminds me why I so appreciate the work of The New London Group (*) and Multiliteracies. They take a DESIGN approach to culture where culture is an ongoing process of reconstructing the meaning we get from the richness of the resources availabe to us. Culture is something which is hybrid, dynamic, open and constantly undergoing transformation.
I also notice the similarities between what the New London Group were saying and Phronesis, the name of my blog. That is, Aristotle's phronesis and the New London Group take a design approach to culture that would suggest responsibility and ethics. They say:
"This is ... an understanding of
culture capable of accounting for change, both retrospectively in the
sense of how our history and our lives have changed, and prospectively
in the sense of how we are designers of social futures and makers of
our own futures... It is an account of culture which has
implications for individual responsibility and the ethics of
participation. As transformers of meaning and makers of culture, we are
all deeply responsible for the immediate consequences of our Designing
and, in a larger sense, our individual and collective futures." (p. 205)
Hum .. I think I might be ready now to put in my chapter proposal.
(Mind you, I'm still at a loss to explain why I find it so difficult to be on time. And why there are so many grown men in Portugal who still let their mothers keep them in nappies!)
COPE, B. and KALANTZIS, M., (2000) Eds., Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social future. New York: Routledge
technorati tags:culturechange, culturalcontext
Recent Comments